MFSG vs XOVR
MFS Active Growth ETF vs ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Which is better, MFSG or XOVR?
MFSG has been ahead.
MFSG has a lower expense ratio. MFSG led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSG | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 1.81% |
| AUM | $406M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 69 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +7.53%Best | +6.41% |
| 1Y Return | +9.18%Best | +1.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5%Best | 23.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.2%Best | -25.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,025Best | $11,245 |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | ERShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | Nov 7, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
MFSG vs XOVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
MFSG vs XOVR Performance
MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is an ETF from ERShares. Over the past year MFSG returned +9.18% while XOVR returned +1.58%. Year to date, MFSG is up 7.53% versus a gain of 6.41% for XOVR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 17.5% for MFSG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.2% for MFSG and -25.2% for XOVR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSG charges 0.49% per year while XOVR charges 1.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $181 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSG currently yields 0.06% against 0.00% for XOVR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 33.2% of MFSG's money is in holdings XOVR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XOVR, our book for it covers 77.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in MFSG and 30 in XOVR, against full books of 69 and 33.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFSG | Weight in XOVR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.98% | 9.73% | 4.25% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.60% | 5.74% | 5.86% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.81% | 4.78% | 1.97% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 1.96% | 2.97% | 1.01% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.49% | 3.34% | 2.85% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 1.17% | 2.44% | 1.27% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.15% | 1.70% | 0.55% |
33.2% of MFSG is already inside XOVR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSG or XOVR?
MFSG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while XOVR charges 1.81%. MFSG is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFSG or XOVR?
Over the past year MFSG returned +9.18% vs +1.58% for XOVR, so MFSG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSG annualized +10.19% vs +6.37% for XOVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFSG or XOVR?
XOVR has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 17.5% for MFSG. Worst drawdown: MFSG -23.2% vs XOVR -25.2%.
Should I hold both MFSG and XOVR?
MFSG and XOVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSG and XOVR?
At least 33.2% of MFSG's money is in holdings XOVR also owns. Our book for XOVR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in MFSG and 30 in XOVR.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSG or XOVR?
MFSG yields 0.06% while XOVR yields 0.00%, so MFSG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XOVR better than MFSG?
MFSG has a lower expense ratio. MFSG led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.