MFSV vs SASS
MFS Active Value ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, MFSV or SASS?
MFSV costs less.
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSV | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $618M | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 64 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +9.21%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +12.64% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.9%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MFSV vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MFSV vs SASS Performance
MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, MFSV is up 9.21% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSV charges 0.44% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $75 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSV currently yields 1.41% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
7.2% of MFSV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 11.4% of SASS's money is in holdings MFSV also owns.
SASS and MFSV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in MFSV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 64 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 60 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
MFSV holds 57 positions SASS does not, 89.5% of the fund.
Largest: MSFT 5.35%, JPM 4.50%, AAPL 3.09%, XOM 3.04%, CI 2.75%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MFSV and SASS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSV or SASS?
MFSV has an expense ratio of 0.44% while SASS charges 0.75%. MFSV is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSV and SASS?
11.4% of SASS's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 11.4% of SASS's is in holdings MFSV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in MFSV and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSV or SASS?
MFSV yields 1.41% while SASS yields 0.00%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than MFSV?
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.