MIGO vs VTI
MIG Core ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MIGO or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIGO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $784M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +19.14%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | MIG Capital, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 20, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MIGO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MIGO vs VTI Performance
MIG Core ETF (MIGO) is an ETF from MIG Capital, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, MIGO is up 19.14% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIGO charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIGO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
55.4% of MIGO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 27.8% of VTI's money is in holdings MIGO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
38 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in MIGO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 50 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,122 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MIGO (69.7% of the fund), and 9 for MIGO that do not appear in VTI (40.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MIGO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.45% | 5.11% | 1.66% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.66% | 6.88% | 6.22% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.63% | 3.41% | 0.78% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.54% | 2.38% | 1.16% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.62% | 2.12% | 0.50% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.03% | 1.70% | 1.33% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.13% | 1.46% | 1.67% |
| DXCMDexcom Inc. | 2.92% | 0.05% | 2.87% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.61% | 1.33% | 0.28% |
| SHCSotera Health Co | 2.30% | 0.01% | 2.29% |
55.4% of MIGO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIGO or VTI?
MIGO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MIGO and VTI?
55.4% of MIGO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 27.8% of VTI's is in holdings MIGO also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in MIGO and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIGO or VTI?
MIGO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MIGO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.