MILN vs PCLG
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, MILN or PCLG?
PCLG has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. PCLG led over 1Y and the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MILN | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $89M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 164 | 27 |
| YTD Return | -7.25% | -5.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.86% | -8.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.75% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.22% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9%Best | 17.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.7%Best | -23.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $8,818 | $9,249Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.8%Best | 62.6% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2016 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
MILN vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
MILN vs PCLG Performance
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Over the past year MILN returned -10.86% while PCLG returned -8.10%. Year to date, MILN is down 7.25% versus a loss of 5.60% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.9% for MILN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.7% for MILN and -23.8% for PCLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MILN charges 0.50% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $49 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MILN currently yields 0.33% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
13.5% of MILN's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 14.7% of PCLG's money is in holdings MILN also owns.
PCLG and MILN share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in MILN and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 164 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for MILN (76.2% of the fund), and 74 for MILN that do not appear in PCLG (82.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MILN and PCLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MILN or PCLG?
MILN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PCLG charges 0.49%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MILN or PCLG?
Over the past year MILN returned -10.86% vs -8.10% for PCLG, so PCLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MILN annualized -11.82% vs -7.51% for PCLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MILN or PCLG?
PCLG has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.9% for MILN. Worst drawdown: MILN -20.7% vs PCLG -23.8%.
Should I hold both MILN and PCLG?
MILN and PCLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MILN and PCLG?
14.7% of PCLG's money is in holdings MILN also owns. 14.7% of PCLG's is in holdings MILN also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in MILN and 29 in PCLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, MILN or PCLG?
MILN yields 0.33% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so MILN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than MILN?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. PCLG led over 1Y and the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.