MILN vs SSPX
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF vs Janus Henderson US Sustainable Equity ETF
Which is better, MILN or SSPX?
SSPX has been ahead.
MILN has a lower expense ratio. SSPX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MILN | SSPX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $89M | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 0.30% |
| Holdings | 164 | 6 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 18.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.4% | -34.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $11,057 | $12,842Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2016 | Sep 8, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 370 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. MILN has data through Oct 14, 2026 and SSPX through Oct 9, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2021 to Oct 9, 2025 (4.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MILN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 18.9% for SSPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.4% for MILN and -34.0% for SSPX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MILN charges 0.50% per year while SSPX charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $55 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MILN currently yields 0.33% against 0.30% for SSPX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MILN and SSPX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MILN or SSPX?
MILN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SSPX charges 0.55%. MILN is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, MILN or SSPX?
MILN has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 18.9% for SSPX. Worst drawdown: MILN -44.4% vs SSPX -34.0%.
Should I hold both MILN and SSPX?
MILN and SSPX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MILN or SSPX?
MILN yields 0.33% while SSPX yields 0.30%, so MILN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SSPX better than MILN?
MILN has a lower expense ratio. SSPX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.