MILN vs XAIW
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF vs SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, MILN or XAIW?
MILN costs less.
MILN has a lower expense ratio. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MILN | XAIW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $89M | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 164 | 25 |
| YTD Return | -7.25% | -3.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.86% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.75% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.22% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.8%Best | 61.4% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2016 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MILN vs XAIW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MILN vs XAIW Performance
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, MILN is down 7.25% versus a loss of 3.89% for XAIW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MILN charges 0.50% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $59 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MILN currently yields 0.33% against 0.00% for XAIW.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 80 holdings in MILN and 26 in XAIW, totalling 99.8% and 95.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in MILN and 26 in XAIW, against full books of 164 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for MILN (80.4% of the fund), and 78 for MILN that do not appear in XAIW (95.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MILN and XAIW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MILN or XAIW?
MILN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while XAIW charges 0.59%. MILN is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, MILN or XAIW?
MILN yields 0.33% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so MILN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XAIW better than MILN?
MILN has a lower expense ratio. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.