MIN vs VTI
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MIN or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MIN led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $284M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.33% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 253 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +476.39%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +475.04%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +90.18%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +43.41%Best | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 100.6% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.8% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $60,659Best | $17,616 |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 17, 1988 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Oct 14, 2026 (25.4 years).
MIN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.4 years both funds cover.
MIN vs VTI Performance
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund (MIN) is an ETF from Aberdeen Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MIN returned +475.04% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, MIN is up 476.39% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, MIN compounded at +90.18% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +43.41% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.04% annualized vs +5.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 100.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.8% for MIN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIN charges 0.64% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIN currently yields 9.33% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings MIN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MIN, our book for it covers 66.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 149 positions we hold weights for in MIN and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 253 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MIN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMUST-Mobile Usa, Inc. 3.875% 15-Apr-2030 | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.71% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MIN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIN or VTI?
MIN has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MIN or VTI?
Over the past year MIN returned +475.04% vs +16.63% for VTI, so MIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), MIN annualized +5.05% vs +8.04% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MIN or VTI?
MIN has been the more volatile fund at 100.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MIN -57.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MIN and VTI?
MIN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIN or VTI?
MIN yields 9.33% while VTI yields 1.06%, so MIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MIN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MIN led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.