MIVL vs QQQ
MFS Active International Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MIVL or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MIVL is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIVL | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 66 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -0.13% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.8%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MIVL vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MIVL vs QQQ Performance
MFS Active International Value ETF (MIVL) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, MIVL is down 0.13% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIVL charges 0.57% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $18 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIVL currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of MIVL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings MIVL also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in MIVL and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 66 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for MIVL (96.0% of the fund), and 3 for MIVL that do not appear in QQQ (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MIVL | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 0.87% | 0.25% | 0.62% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MIVL and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIVL or QQQ?
MIVL has an expense ratio of 0.57% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIVL or QQQ?
MIVL yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MIVL?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MIVL is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.