MOO vs NBXG
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc
Which is better, MOO or NBXG?
Each has led over a different period.
MOO has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, NBXG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOO | NBXG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56%Best | 1.30% |
| AUM | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.20% | 7.97% |
| Holdings | 51 | 137 |
| YTD Return | +11.48% | +12.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.93%Best | +11.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.11% | +25.57%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.95% | +6.29%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1%Best | 22.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.5%Best | -51.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,534 | $13,566Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2007 | May 25, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 26, 2021 to Oct 15, 2026 (5.4 years).
MOO vs NBXG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.4 years both funds cover.
MOO vs NBXG Performance
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck and Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc (NBXG) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Over the past year MOO returned +15.93% while NBXG returned +11.61%. Year to date, MOO is up 11.48% versus a gain of 12.02% for NBXG.
Over three years, MOO compounded at +4.11% per year against +25.57% for NBXG; over five years the annualized figures are -0.95% and +6.29% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 18.1% for MOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.5% for MOO and -51.8% for NBXG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOO charges 0.56% per year while NBXG charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $130 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOO currently yields 2.20% against 7.97% for NBXG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 8.5% of MOO's money is in holdings NBXG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NBXG, our book for it covers 85.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
MOO and NBXG share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, MOO as of Oct 1, 2026 and NBXG as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 54 in NBXG, against full books of 51 and 137.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOO | Weight in NBXG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 8.48% | 0.00% | 8.48% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MOO and NBXG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOO or NBXG?
MOO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while NBXG charges 1.30%. MOO is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOO or NBXG?
Over the past year MOO returned +15.93% vs +11.61% for NBXG, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOO or NBXG?
NBXG has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 18.1% for MOO. Worst drawdown: MOO -41.5% vs NBXG -51.8%.
Should I hold both MOO and NBXG?
MOO and NBXG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOO and NBXG?
At least 8.5% of MOO's money is in holdings NBXG also owns. Our book for NBXG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in MOO and 54 in NBXG.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOO or NBXG?
MOO yields 2.20% while NBXG yields 7.97%, so NBXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBXG better than MOO?
MOO has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, NBXG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.