MRCP vs PBJN
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June
Which is better, MRCP or PBJN?
MRCP has been ahead.
MRCP led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MRCP | PBJN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $30M | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 16 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +10.54%Best | +5.35% |
| 1Y Return | +14.01%Best | +7.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.2% | 4.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.7% | -8.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,808Best | $12,644 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 29, 2024 | May 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
MRCP vs PBJN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
MRCP vs PBJN Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June (PBJN) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year MRCP returned +14.01% while PBJN returned +7.56%. Year to date, MRCP is up 10.54% versus a gain of 5.35% for PBJN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MRCP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.2% compared with 4.7% for PBJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.7% for MRCP and -8.7% for PBJN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MRCP charges 0.50% per year while PBJN charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, MRCP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PBJN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MRCP and PBJN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MRCP or PBJN?
MRCP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PBJN charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, MRCP or PBJN?
Over the past year MRCP returned +14.01% vs +7.56% for PBJN, so MRCP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MRCP annualized +14.39% vs +10.27% for PBJN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MRCP or PBJN?
MRCP has been the more volatile fund at 6.2% annualized versus 4.7% for PBJN. Worst drawdown: MRCP -10.7% vs PBJN -8.7%.
Should I hold both MRCP and PBJN?
MRCP and PBJN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MRCP or PBJN?
MRCP yields 0.00% while PBJN yields 0.00%, so PBJN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBJN better than MRCP?
MRCP led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.