MSFO vs RSST
YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF vs Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, MSFO or RSST?
RSST has been ahead.
RSST has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFO | RSST |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.99%Best |
| AUM | $87M | $602M |
| Dividend Yield | 38.50% | 0.23% |
| Holdings | 30 | 36 |
| YTD Return | +10.80% | +25.38%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.00% | +32.18%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.27% | +22.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.5% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.6%Best | -30.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,970 | $17,822Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | Sep 6, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
MSFO vs RSST growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
MSFO vs RSST Performance
YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year MSFO returned +4.00% while RSST returned +32.18%. Year to date, MSFO is up 10.80% versus a gain of 25.38% for RSST.
Over three years, MSFO compounded at +16.27% per year against +22.28% for RSST.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 17.1% for RSST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.6% for MSFO and -30.8% for RSST. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFO charges 1.03% per year while RSST charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $99 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFO currently yields 38.50% against 0.23% for RSST.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in MSFO and 2 in RSST, totalling 26.6% and 88.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in MSFO and 2 in RSST, against full books of 30 and 36.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MSFO | Weight in RSST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 2.43% | 14.34% | 11.91% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSFO and RSST you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFO or RSST?
MSFO has an expense ratio of 1.03% while RSST charges 0.99%. RSST is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MSFO or RSST?
Over the past year MSFO returned +4.00% vs +32.18% for RSST, so RSST leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSFO or RSST?
MSFO has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 17.1% for RSST. Worst drawdown: MSFO -29.6% vs RSST -30.8%.
Should I hold both MSFO and RSST?
MSFO and RSST have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFO or RSST?
MSFO yields 38.50% while RSST yields 0.23%, so MSFO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSST better than MSFO?
RSST has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.