MSFU vs NFLU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF vs T-Rex 2X Long NFLX Daily Target ETF
Which is better, MSFU or NFLU?
MSFU has been ahead.
MSFU has a lower expense ratio. MSFU led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFU | NFLU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $548M | $27M |
| Dividend Yield | 8.00% | 0.02% |
| Holdings | 14 | 5 |
| YTD Return | +9.11%Best | -51.23% |
| 1Y Return | -10.27%Best | -74.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.23% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 63.6%Best | 71.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.4%Best | -81.8% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $11,389Best | $6,104 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | REX Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | Sep 27, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
MSFU vs NFLU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
MSFU vs NFLU Performance
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF (MSFU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and T-Rex 2X Long NFLX Daily Target ETF (NFLU) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year MSFU returned -10.27% while NFLU returned -74.20%. Year to date, MSFU is up 9.11% versus a loss of 51.23% for NFLU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NFLU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 71.3% compared with 63.6% for MSFU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.4% for MSFU and -81.8% for NFLU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFU charges 0.99% per year while NFLU charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $105 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFU currently yields 8.00% against 0.02% for NFLU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSFU and NFLU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFU or NFLU?
MSFU has an expense ratio of 0.99% while NFLU charges 1.05%. MSFU is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MSFU or NFLU?
Over the past year MSFU returned -10.27% vs -74.20% for NFLU, so MSFU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSFU annualized +6.72% vs -21.87% for NFLU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSFU or NFLU?
NFLU has been the more volatile fund at 71.3% annualized versus 63.6% for MSFU. Worst drawdown: MSFU -62.4% vs NFLU -81.8%.
Should I hold both MSFU and NFLU?
MSFU and NFLU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFU or NFLU?
MSFU yields 8.00% while NFLU yields 0.02%, so MSFU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NFLU better than MSFU?
MSFU has a lower expense ratio. MSFU led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.