MSTU vs MSTZ
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF vs T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
Which is better, MSTU or MSTZ?
MSTU has been ahead.
MSTU led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTU | MSTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05%Tie | 1.05%Tie |
| AUM | $788M | $90M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 24 | 9 |
| YTD Return | +284.55%Best | -81.14% |
| 1Y Return | -12.54%Best | -47.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1226.4% | 185.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $13,423Best | $57 |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | REX Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Leverage Strategy |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | Sep 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Max Drawdown, Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
MSTU vs MSTZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
MSTU vs MSTZ Performance
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) is an ETF from REX Shares and T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year MSTU returned -12.54% while MSTZ returned -47.19%. Year to date, MSTU is up 284.55% versus a loss of 81.14% for MSTZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1226.4% compared with 185.3% for MSTZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTU charges 1.05% per year while MSTZ charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $105 annually. On income, MSTU currently yields 0.07% against 0.00% for MSTZ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSTU and MSTZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTU or MSTZ?
MSTU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while MSTZ charges 1.05%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, MSTU or MSTZ?
Over the past year MSTU returned -12.54% vs -47.19% for MSTZ, so MSTU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTU annualized +15.05% vs -91.45% for MSTZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSTU or MSTZ?
MSTU has been the more volatile fund at 1226.4% annualized versus 185.3% for MSTZ.
Should I hold both MSTU and MSTZ?
MSTU and MSTZ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTU or MSTZ?
MSTU yields 0.07% while MSTZ yields 0.00%, so MSTU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSTZ better than MSTU?
MSTU led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.