MSTU vs NFXS
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF vs Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X ETF
Which is better, MSTU or NFXS?
NFXS has been ahead.
NFXS has a lower expense ratio. NFXS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTU | NFXS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 1.03%Best |
| AUM | $788M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 2.41% |
| Holdings | 24 | 16 |
| YTD Return | +284.55%Best | +22.20% |
| 1Y Return | -12.54% | +61.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1252.6% | 36.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -50.4% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $9,095 | $9,097Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Leverage Strategy |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | Oct 3, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
MSTU vs NFXS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
MSTU vs NFXS Performance
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) is an ETF from REX Shares and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X ETF (NFXS) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year MSTU returned -12.54% while NFXS returned +61.23%. Year to date, MSTU is up 284.55% versus a gain of 22.20% for NFXS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1252.6% compared with 36.6% for NFXS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTU charges 1.05% per year while NFXS charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $103 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTU currently yields 0.07% against 2.41% for NFXS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in MSTU and 3 in NFXS, totalling 0.0% and 79.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in MSTU and 3 in NFXS, against full books of 24 and 16.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSTU and NFXS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTU or NFXS?
MSTU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while NFXS charges 1.03%. NFXS is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MSTU or NFXS?
Over the past year MSTU returned -12.54% vs +61.23% for NFXS, so NFXS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTU annualized -4.63% vs -4.62% for NFXS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSTU or NFXS?
MSTU has been the more volatile fund at 1252.6% annualized versus 36.6% for NFXS.
Should I hold both MSTU and NFXS?
MSTU and NFXS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTU or NFXS?
MSTU yields 0.07% while NFXS yields 2.41%, so NFXS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NFXS better than MSTU?
NFXS has a lower expense ratio. NFXS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.