MSTY vs XBJA
YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, MSTY or XBJA?
Each has led over a different period.
XBJA has a lower expense ratio. MSTY led over the full window, XBJA over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTY | XBJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $94M |
| Dividend Yield | 140.54% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 28 | 21 |
| YTD Return | -10.02% | +8.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | -46.73% | +11.38%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 78.6% | 5.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -77.4% | -12.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $15,819Best | $13,047 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 21, 2024 | Dec 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.6 years).
MSTY vs XBJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
MSTY vs XBJA Performance
YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year MSTY returned -46.73% while XBJA returned +11.38%. Year to date, MSTY is down 10.02% versus a gain of 8.88% for XBJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 78.6% compared with 5.7% for XBJA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.4% for MSTY and -12.6% for XBJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTY charges 1.03% per year while XBJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $79 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTY currently yields 140.54% against 0.00% for XBJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSTY and XBJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTY or XBJA?
MSTY has an expense ratio of 1.03% while XBJA charges 0.79%. XBJA is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MSTY or XBJA?
Over the past year MSTY returned -46.73% vs +11.38% for XBJA, so XBJA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSTY or XBJA?
MSTY has been the more volatile fund at 78.6% annualized versus 5.7% for XBJA. Worst drawdown: MSTY -77.4% vs XBJA -12.6%.
Should I hold both MSTY and XBJA?
MSTY and XBJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTY or XBJA?
MSTY yields 140.54% while XBJA yields 0.00%, so MSTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBJA better than MSTY?
XBJA has a lower expense ratio. MSTY led over the full window, XBJA over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.