MSTZ vs NFXS
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF vs Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X ETF
Which is better, MSTZ or NFXS?
NFXS has been ahead.
NFXS has a lower expense ratio. NFXS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTZ | NFXS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 1.03%Best |
| AUM | $90M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.41% |
| Holdings | 9 | 16 |
| YTD Return | -81.14% | +22.20%Best |
| 1Y Return | -47.19% | +61.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 184.1% | 36.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -50.4% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $108 | $9,097Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Leverage Strategy |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | Oct 3, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
MSTZ vs NFXS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
MSTZ vs NFXS Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is an ETF from REX Shares and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X ETF (NFXS) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year MSTZ returned -47.19% while NFXS returned +61.23%. Year to date, MSTZ is down 81.14% versus a gain of 22.20% for NFXS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 184.1% compared with 36.6% for NFXS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTZ charges 1.05% per year while NFXS charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $103 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTZ currently yields 0.00% against 2.41% for NFXS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSTZ and NFXS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTZ or NFXS?
MSTZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while NFXS charges 1.03%. NFXS is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MSTZ or NFXS?
Over the past year MSTZ returned -47.19% vs +61.23% for NFXS, so NFXS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTZ annualized -89.59% vs -4.62% for NFXS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSTZ or NFXS?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 184.1% annualized versus 36.6% for NFXS.
Should I hold both MSTZ and NFXS?
MSTZ and NFXS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTZ or NFXS?
MSTZ yields 0.00% while NFXS yields 2.41%, so NFXS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NFXS better than MSTZ?
NFXS has a lower expense ratio. NFXS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.