MTAW vs RJCA
Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF vs RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF
Which is better, MTAW or RJCA?
MTAW costs less.
MTAW has a lower expense ratio. MTAW is less concentrated, with 54.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MTAW | RJCA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $2M | $617M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 25 | 72 |
| YTD Return | -1.65% | +4.02%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.5%Best | 57.0% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Carillon Family of Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Mar 21, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MTAW vs RJCA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MTAW vs RJCA Performance
Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (MTAW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, MTAW is down 1.65% versus a gain of 4.02% for RJCA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MTAW charges 0.59% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $61 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTAW currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for RJCA.
Holdings Overlap
42.3% of MTAW's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 32.9% of RJCA's money is in holdings MTAW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in MTAW and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 25 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 62 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for MTAW (66.1% of the fund), and 12 for MTAW that do not appear in RJCA (37.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MTAW | Weight in RJCA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 19.11% | 3.16% | 15.95% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.50% | 15.22% | 11.72% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.92% | 5.18% | 2.26% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.17% | 3.68% | 0.51% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.73% | 3.06% | 0.33% |
| CIENCiena Corp | 4.86% | 0.36% | 4.50% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 2.53% | 1.69% | 0.84% |
| GLWCorning Inc. | 3.43% | 0.54% | 2.89% |
42.3% of MTAW is already inside RJCA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MTAW or RJCA?
MTAW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while RJCA charges 0.61%. MTAW is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MTAW and RJCA?
42.3% of MTAW's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 32.9% of RJCA's is in holdings MTAW also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in MTAW and 71 in RJCA.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTAW or RJCA?
MTAW yields 0.00% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so RJCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RJCA better than MTAW?
MTAW has a lower expense ratio. MTAW is less concentrated, with 54.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.