NANC vs SPYM
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NANC or SPYM?
Nearly the same fund. SPYM costs less.
SPYM has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 3Y and the full window, SPYM over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. SPYM is less concentrated, with 39.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.02%Best |
| AUM | $298M | $185.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 181 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.64%Best | +13.57% |
| 1Y Return | +15.98% | +17.53%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.88%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.29% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $20,418Best | $19,548 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.5% | 39.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Nov 8, 2005 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).
NANC vs SPYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
NANC vs SPYM Performance
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is an ETF from Subversive Capital and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year NANC returned +15.98% while SPYM returned +17.53%. Year to date, NANC is up 13.64% versus a gain of 13.57% for SPYM.
Over three years, NANC compounded at +23.88% per year against +22.46% for SPYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +21.28% annualized vs +19.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 12.2% for SPYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for NANC and -18.7% for SPYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while SPYM charges 0.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $2 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.18% against 1.01% for SPYM.
Holdings Overlap
90.3% of NANC's money is in holdings SPYM also owns. 58.1% of SPYM's money is in holdings NANC also owns.
Most of NANC is already inside SPYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 505 in SPYM, against full books of 181 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 428 positions for SPYM that do not appear in our book for NANC (41.2% of the fund), and 17 for NANC that do not appear in SPYM (8.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NANC | Weight in SPYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.78% | 8.49% | 0.29% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.66% | 5.76% | 0.90% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.41% | 7.30% | 2.89% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.69% | 3.70% | 0.99% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.73% | 2.42% | 3.31% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.52% | 0.64% | 3.88% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 4.59% | 0.41% | 4.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.37% | 2.41% | 0.04% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.69% | 1.82% | 0.87% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.45% | 1.37% | 1.08% |
90.3% of NANC is already inside SPYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or SPYM?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while SPYM charges 0.02%. SPYM is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NANC or SPYM?
Over the past year NANC returned +15.98% vs +17.53% for SPYM, so SPYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NANC annualized +21.28% vs +19.86% for SPYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NANC or SPYM?
NANC has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 12.2% for SPYM. Worst drawdown: NANC -20.9% vs SPYM -18.7%.
Should I hold both NANC and SPYM?
NANC and SPYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and SPYM?
90.3% of NANC's money is in holdings SPYM also owns. 58.1% of SPYM's is in holdings NANC also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 505 in SPYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or SPYM?
NANC yields 0.18% while SPYM yields 1.01%, so SPYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPYM better than NANC?
SPYM has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 3Y and the full window, SPYM over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. SPYM is less concentrated, with 39.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.