NBCR vs NOEQ

NBCR vs NOEQ

Which is better, NBCR or NOEQ?

NOEQ costs less.

NOEQ has a lower expense ratio. NBCR is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.7%.

Lower Fees: NOEQLess Concentrated: NBCR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNBCRNOEQ
Expense Ratio0.29%0.12%Best
AUM$856M$906M
Dividend Yield0.42%0.41%
Holdings206406
YTD Return+9.07%+17.94%Best
1Y Return+12.46%-
Top 10 Weight36.9%Best61.7%
Fund FamilyNeuberger BermanNorthern Trust Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 31, 2024Mar 20, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NBCR vs NOEQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare NBCR against instead:NBCR vs SPYNBCR vs QQQNBCR vs VOONBCR vs VTINOEQ against:NOEQ vs VXUS

NBCR vs NOEQ Performance

Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF (NBCR) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Northern Trust US Equity ETF (NOEQ) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Year to date, NBCR is up 9.07% versus a gain of 17.94% for NOEQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NBCR charges 0.29% per year while NOEQ charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $12 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBCR currently yields 0.42% against 0.41% for NOEQ.

Holdings Overlap

NBCR already in NOEQ80.5%
NOEQ already in NBCR58.0%

80.5% of NBCR's money is in holdings NOEQ also owns. 58.0% of NOEQ's money is in holdings NBCR also owns.

Most of NBCR is already inside NOEQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

114 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in NBCR and 401 in NOEQ, against full books of 206 and 406.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 190 positions for NOEQ that do not appear in our book for NBCR (40.1% of the fund), and 83 for NBCR that do not appear in NOEQ (18.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NBCRWeight in NOEQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.72%3.29%4.43%
AAPLApple, Inc6.95%2.86%4.09%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.31%6.58%4.27%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.03%2.09%3.94%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.51%4.53%1.02%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common1.21%4.06%2.85%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.44%3.48%2.04%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.0.70%4.11%3.41%
CVXChevron Corp0.66%3.88%3.22%
BABoeing Co0.43%3.38%2.95%

80.5% of NBCR is already inside NOEQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NBCRNOEQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NBCR or NOEQ?

NBCR has an expense ratio of 0.29% while NOEQ charges 0.12%. NOEQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NBCR and NOEQ?

80.5% of NBCR's money is in holdings NOEQ also owns. 58.0% of NOEQ's is in holdings NBCR also owns. They hold 114 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in NBCR and 401 in NOEQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, NBCR or NOEQ?

NBCR yields 0.42% while NOEQ yields 0.41%, so NBCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NOEQ better than NBCR?

NOEQ has a lower expense ratio. NBCR is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.