NBCR vs RECS
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Which is better, NBCR or RECS?
Nearly the same fund. RECS costs less.
RECS has a lower expense ratio. RECS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. NBCR is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBCR | RECS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.15%Best |
| AUM | $856M | $6.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 206 | 718 |
| YTD Return | +8.54% | +11.16%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.11% | +15.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 11.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2%Best | -18.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,791 | $14,395Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 42.0% |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2024 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
NBCR vs RECS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
NBCR vs RECS Performance
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF (NBCR) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year NBCR returned +12.11% while RECS returned +15.54%. Year to date, NBCR is up 8.54% versus a gain of 11.16% for RECS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 11.2% for RECS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for NBCR and -18.6% for RECS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBCR charges 0.29% per year while RECS charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $15 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBCR currently yields 0.42% against 1.01% for RECS.
Holdings Overlap
33.1% of NBCR's money is in holdings RECS also owns. 54.2% of RECS's money is in holdings NBCR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
50 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in NBCR and 353 in RECS, against full books of 206 and 718.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 287 positions for RECS that do not appear in our book for NBCR (44.2% of the fund), and 145 for NBCR that do not appear in RECS (64.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NBCR | Weight in RECS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.72% | 12.01% | 4.29% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.95% | 11.96% | 5.01% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.26% | 4.79% | 2.53% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.48% | 2.28% | 0.80% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.02% | 2.36% | 1.34% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.49% | 2.04% | 1.55% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 1.61% | 0.73% | 0.88% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.66% | 1.60% | 0.94% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.76% | 1.05% | 0.29% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 0.38% | 1.24% | 0.86% |
54.2% of RECS is already inside NBCR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBCR or RECS?
NBCR has an expense ratio of 0.29% while RECS charges 0.15%. RECS is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBCR or RECS?
Over the past year NBCR returned +12.11% vs +15.54% for RECS, so RECS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBCR annualized +15.73% vs +18.01% for RECS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBCR or RECS?
NBCR has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 11.2% for RECS. Worst drawdown: NBCR -18.2% vs RECS -18.6%.
Should I hold both NBCR and RECS?
NBCR and RECS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NBCR and RECS?
54.2% of RECS's money is in holdings NBCR also owns. 54.2% of RECS's is in holdings NBCR also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in NBCR and 353 in RECS.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBCR or RECS?
NBCR yields 0.42% while RECS yields 1.01%, so RECS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RECS better than NBCR?
RECS has a lower expense ratio. RECS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. NBCR is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.