NDVG vs NUDG
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, NDVG or NUDG?
NUDG has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDVG | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $6.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 43 | 43 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.3% | 42.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 4, 2021 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 191 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. NDVG has data through Apr 6, 2026 and NUDG through Oct 14, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDVG charges 0.65% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $61 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDVG currently yields 1.09% against 0.50% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
77.5% of NDVG's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 72.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings NDVG also owns.
Most of NDVG is already inside NUDG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 243 days apart, NDVG as of Dec 31, 2025 and NUDG as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
30 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in NDVG and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 43 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for NDVG (21.7% of the fund), and 7 for NDVG that do not appear in NUDG (11.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NDVG | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.90% | 7.67% | 0.23% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.70% | 6.37% | 0.33% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.85% | 5.11% | 0.74% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.24% | 3.72% | 0.52% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 3.60% | 3.83% | 0.23% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 3.36% | 2.24% | 1.12% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.76% | 2.54% | 0.22% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 2.68% | 2.43% | 0.25% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.57% | 1.89% | 0.68% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 2.18% | 2.21% | 0.03% |
77.5% of NDVG is already inside NUDG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDVG or NUDG?
NDVG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NDVG and NUDG?
77.5% of NDVG's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 72.8% of NUDG's is in holdings NDVG also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in NDVG and 42 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDVG or NUDG?
NDVG yields 1.09% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so NDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than NDVG?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.