NFLP vs ZALT
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix (NFLX) ETF vs Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Which is better, NFLP or ZALT?
ZALT has been ahead.
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NFLP | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $794M |
| Dividend Yield | 26.62% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 18 |
| YTD Return | -38.66% | +6.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | -53.66% | +9.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -13.41% | +10.33%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 3.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -60.6% | -8.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $6,492 | $13,750Best |
| Fund Family | Kurv | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2023 | Oct 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
NFLP vs ZALT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
NFLP vs ZALT Performance
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix (NFLX) ETF (NFLP) is an ETF from Kurv and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year NFLP returned -53.66% while ZALT returned +9.12%. Year to date, NFLP is down 38.66% versus a gain of 6.44% for ZALT.
Over three years, NFLP compounded at -13.41% per year against +10.33% for ZALT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NFLP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 3.8% for ZALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.6% for NFLP and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NFLP charges 0.99% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $69 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NFLP currently yields 26.62% against 0.00% for ZALT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NFLP and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NFLP or ZALT?
NFLP has an expense ratio of 0.99% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NFLP or ZALT?
Over the past year NFLP returned -53.66% vs +9.12% for ZALT, so ZALT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NFLP or ZALT?
NFLP has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 3.8% for ZALT. Worst drawdown: NFLP -60.6% vs ZALT -8.2%.
Should I hold both NFLP and ZALT?
NFLP and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NFLP or ZALT?
NFLP yields 26.62% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so NFLP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZALT better than NFLP?
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.