NISM vs VXUS
NYLIM International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, NISM or VXUS?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NISM | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | - | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.24% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 91 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -0.33% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Fund Family | New York Life Investment Management LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 13, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NISM vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NISM vs VXUS Performance
NYLIM International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM) is an ETF from New York Life Investment Management LLC and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NISM is down 0.33% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NISM charges 0.70% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $5 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NISM currently yields 0.24% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 71.9% of NISM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of NISM is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
65 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NISM and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 91 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NISM | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOL:AUWashington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited Ordinary Fully Paid | 2.24% | 0.02% | 2.22% |
| TRN:MITerna Rete Elettrica Nazionale Spa | 2.08% | 0.03% | 2.05% |
| 8697:TKJapan Exchange Group, Inc | 2.05% | 0.03% | 2.02% |
| GTT:PAGaztransport et Technigaz SA | 2.05% | 0.02% | 2.03% |
| X:CATmx Group Ltd. | 2.03% | 0.02% | 2.01% |
| INA:AUIngenia Communities Group | 2.03% | 0.00% | 2.03% |
| 6762:JPTdk Corp | 1.95% | 0.08% | 1.87% |
| CTC/A:CACanadian Tire Corp Ltd | 1.98% | 0.01% | 1.97% |
| 5020:JPJxtg Holdings Inc | 1.91% | 0.05% | 1.86% |
| KPN:ASKoninklijke KPN N.V. Shs | 1.84% | 0.04% | 1.80% |
71.9% of NISM is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NISM or VXUS?
NISM has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NISM and VXUS?
At least 71.9% of NISM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 65 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NISM and 8,425 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, NISM or VXUS?
NISM yields 0.24% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than NISM?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.