NITE vs RWLC
The Nightview Fund ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, NITE or RWLC?
RWLC has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NITE | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 12.70% |
| Holdings | 38 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +4.15% | +18.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.11% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 69.0% | 37.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Nightview Capital | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NITE vs RWLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NITE vs RWLC Performance
The Nightview Fund ETF (NITE) is an ETF from Nightview Capital and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, NITE is up 4.15% versus a gain of 18.51% for RWLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NITE charges 1.25% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $32 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NITE currently yields 0.00% against 12.70% for RWLC.
Holdings Overlap
42.4% of NITE's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 13.1% of RWLC's money is in holdings NITE also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in NITE and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 38 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for NITE (85.7% of the fund), and 13 for NITE that do not appear in RWLC (57.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
42.4% of NITE is already inside RWLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NITE or RWLC?
NITE has an expense ratio of 1.25% while RWLC charges 0.32%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NITE and RWLC?
42.4% of NITE's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 13.1% of RWLC's is in holdings NITE also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in NITE and 101 in RWLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, NITE or RWLC?
NITE yields 0.00% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWLC better than NITE?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.