NJUN vs QTJA
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
Which is better, NJUN or QTJA?
QTJA has been ahead.
QTJA led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NJUN | QTJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $171M | $25M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +15.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.87% | +19.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -21.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,264 | $14,983Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
NJUN vs QTJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
NJUN vs QTJA Performance
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June (NJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year NJUN returned +7.87% while QTJA returned +19.36%. Year to date, NJUN is up 5.40% versus a gain of 15.68% for QTJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 7.7% for NJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for NJUN and -21.7% for QTJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NJUN charges 0.79% per year while QTJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, NJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QTJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NJUN and QTJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NJUN or QTJA?
NJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QTJA charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, NJUN or QTJA?
Over the past year NJUN returned +7.87% vs +19.36% for QTJA, so QTJA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NJUN annualized +12.49% vs +18.35% for QTJA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NJUN or QTJA?
QTJA has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 7.7% for NJUN. Worst drawdown: NJUN -12.6% vs QTJA -21.7%.
Should I hold both NJUN and QTJA?
NJUN and QTJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NJUN or QTJA?
NJUN yields 0.00% while QTJA yields 0.00%, so QTJA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTJA better than NJUN?
QTJA led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.