NJUN vs QTJL
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Which is better, NJUN or QTJL?
QTJL has been ahead.
QTJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NJUN | QTJL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $171M | $27M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +10.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.87% | +14.05%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.15% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -22.4% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,264 | $14,499Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | Jun 30, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
NJUN vs QTJL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
NJUN vs QTJL Performance
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June (NJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year NJUN returned +7.87% while QTJL returned +14.05%. Year to date, NJUN is up 5.40% versus a gain of 10.01% for QTJL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 7.7% for NJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for NJUN and -22.4% for QTJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NJUN charges 0.79% per year while QTJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, NJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QTJL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NJUN and QTJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NJUN or QTJL?
NJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QTJL charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, NJUN or QTJL?
Over the past year NJUN returned +7.87% vs +14.05% for QTJL, so QTJL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NJUN annualized +12.49% vs +16.74% for QTJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NJUN or QTJL?
QTJL has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 7.7% for NJUN. Worst drawdown: NJUN -12.6% vs QTJL -22.4%.
Should I hold both NJUN and QTJL?
NJUN and QTJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NJUN or QTJL?
NJUN yields 0.00% while QTJL yields 0.00%, so QTJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTJL better than NJUN?
QTJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.