NJUN vs QYLD
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Which is better, NJUN or QYLD?
QYLD has been ahead.
QYLD has a lower expense ratio. QYLD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NJUN | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.60%Best |
| AUM | $171M | $8.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 11.49% |
| Holdings | 18 | 209 |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +15.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.87% | +23.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.90% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7%Best | 8.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,264 | $14,258Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | Dec 11, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
NJUN vs QYLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
NJUN vs QYLD Performance
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June (NJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year NJUN returned +7.87% while QYLD returned +23.04%. Year to date, NJUN is up 5.40% versus a gain of 15.47% for QYLD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QYLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.3% compared with 7.7% for NJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for NJUN and -19.1% for QYLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NJUN charges 0.79% per year while QYLD charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $60 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NJUN currently yields 0.00% against 11.49% for QYLD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NJUN and QYLD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NJUN or QYLD?
NJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QYLD charges 0.60%. QYLD is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NJUN or QYLD?
Over the past year NJUN returned +7.87% vs +23.04% for QYLD, so QYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NJUN annualized +12.49% vs +15.93% for QYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NJUN or QYLD?
QYLD has been the more volatile fund at 8.3% annualized versus 7.7% for NJUN. Worst drawdown: NJUN -12.6% vs QYLD -19.1%.
Should I hold both NJUN and QYLD?
NJUN and QYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NJUN or QYLD?
NJUN yields 0.00% while QYLD yields 11.49%, so QYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QYLD better than NJUN?
QYLD has a lower expense ratio. QYLD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.