NNOV vs QTJA
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
Which is better, NNOV or QTJA?
QTJA has been ahead.
QTJA led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NNOV | QTJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $77M | $25M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +13.27% | +15.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.85% | +19.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9%Best | 13.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.8%Best | -21.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,867 | $13,897Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Dec 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
NNOV vs QTJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
NNOV vs QTJA Performance
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year NNOV returned +13.85% while QTJA returned +19.36%. Year to date, NNOV is up 13.27% versus a gain of 15.68% for QTJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 8.9% for NNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.8% for NNOV and -21.7% for QTJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NNOV charges 0.79% per year while QTJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, NNOV currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QTJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NNOV and QTJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NNOV or QTJA?
NNOV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QTJA charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, NNOV or QTJA?
Over the past year NNOV returned +13.85% vs +19.36% for QTJA, so QTJA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NNOV annualized +14.19% vs +18.91% for QTJA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NNOV or QTJA?
QTJA has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 8.9% for NNOV. Worst drawdown: NNOV -12.8% vs QTJA -21.7%.
Should I hold both NNOV and QTJA?
NNOV and QTJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NNOV or QTJA?
NNOV yields 0.00% while QTJA yields 0.00%, so QTJA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTJA better than NNOV?
QTJA led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.