NNOV vs QTOC

NNOV vs QTOC

Which is better, NNOV or QTOC?

QTOC has been ahead.

QTOC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: QTOC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNNOVQTOC
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$77M$18M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1815
YTD Return+13.46%+14.65%Best
1Y Return+14.02%+17.98%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.32%
Volatility (annualized)8.9%Best11.9%
Max Drawdown-12.8%Best-21.2%
$10,000 over 2 years$13,055$14,073Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionNov 1, 2024Oct 1, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2 years).

NNOV vs QTOC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.

Compare NNOV against instead:NNOV vs SPYNNOV vs QQQNNOV vs VOONNOV vs VTIQTOC against:QTOC vs VXUS

NNOV vs QTOC Performance

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year NNOV returned +14.02% while QTOC returned +17.98%. Year to date, NNOV is up 13.46% versus a gain of 14.65% for QTOC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QTOC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 8.9% for NNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.8% for NNOV and -21.2% for QTOC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NNOV charges 0.79% per year while QTOC charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, NNOV currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QTOC.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NNOV and QTOC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NNOVQTOC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NNOV or QTOC?

NNOV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QTOC charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, NNOV or QTOC?

Over the past year NNOV returned +14.02% vs +17.98% for QTOC, so QTOC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NNOV annualized +14.26% vs +18.63% for QTOC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NNOV or QTOC?

QTOC has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 8.9% for NNOV. Worst drawdown: NNOV -12.8% vs QTOC -21.2%.

Should I hold both NNOV and QTOC?

NNOV and QTOC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NNOV or QTOC?

NNOV yields 0.00% while QTOC yields 0.00%, so QTOC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QTOC better than NNOV?

QTOC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.