NOEQ vs RECI
Northern Trust US Equity ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Which is better, NOEQ or RECI?
NOEQ costs less.
NOEQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NOEQ | RECI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $906M | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.67% |
| Holdings | 406 | 715 |
| YTD Return | +17.57%Best | +2.97% |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2026 | Jul 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NOEQ vs RECI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NOEQ vs RECI Performance
Northern Trust US Equity ETF (NOEQ) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF (RECI) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, NOEQ is up 17.57% versus a gain of 2.97% for RECI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NOEQ charges 0.12% per year while RECI charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $30 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NOEQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.67% for RECI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 18.1% of NOEQ's money is in holdings RECI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RECI, our book for it covers 80.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
NOEQ and RECI share little of their money.
122 positions in common, counted across the 401 positions we hold weights for in NOEQ and 354 in RECI, against full books of 406 and 715.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NOEQ | Weight in RECI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.29% | 10.27% | 6.98% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.86% | 9.59% | 6.73% |
| XLCCommunication Services Select | 4.09% | 2.04% | 2.05% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.88% | 1.23% | 2.65% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.36% | 3.76% | 3.40% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.46% | 2.01% | 1.55% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.25% | 1.83% | 1.58% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.24% | 1.37% | 1.13% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 0.02% | 1.04% | 1.02% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.15% | 0.84% | 0.69% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NOEQ and RECI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NOEQ or RECI?
NOEQ has an expense ratio of 0.12% while RECI charges 0.30%. NOEQ is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NOEQ and RECI?
At least 18.1% of NOEQ's money is in holdings RECI also owns. Our book for RECI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 122 positions in common, counted across the 401 positions we hold weights for in NOEQ and 354 in RECI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NOEQ or RECI?
NOEQ yields 0.41% while RECI yields 0.67%, so RECI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RECI better than NOEQ?
NOEQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.