NOVP vs PBMR
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - March
Which is better, NOVP or PBMR?
NOVP has been ahead.
NOVP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NOVP | PBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $36M | $38M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 8 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +10.87%Best | +7.97% |
| 1Y Return | +13.08%Best | +10.57% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.8% | 4.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -7.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,526Best | $12,816 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 22, 2024 | Feb 29, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
NOVP vs PBMR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
NOVP vs PBMR Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November (NOVP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year NOVP returned +13.08% while PBMR returned +10.57%. Year to date, NOVP is up 10.87% versus a gain of 7.97% for PBMR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NOVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 4.2% for PBMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for NOVP and -7.6% for PBMR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NOVP charges 0.50% per year while PBMR charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, NOVP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PBMR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NOVP and PBMR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NOVP or PBMR?
NOVP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PBMR charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, NOVP or PBMR?
Over the past year NOVP returned +13.08% vs +10.57% for PBMR, so NOVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NOVP annualized +13.41% vs +10.89% for PBMR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NOVP or PBMR?
NOVP has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 4.2% for PBMR. Worst drawdown: NOVP -11.8% vs PBMR -7.6%.
Should I hold both NOVP and PBMR?
NOVP and PBMR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NOVP or PBMR?
NOVP yields 0.00% while PBMR yields 0.00%, so PBMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBMR better than NOVP?
NOVP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.