NQLT vs RJCA

NQLT vs RJCA

Which is better, NQLT or RJCA?

NQLT costs less.

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.

Lower Fees: NQLTLess Concentrated: NQLT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNQLTRJCA
Expense Ratio0.48%Best0.61%
AUM$50M$617M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings6372
YTD Return+2.29%+4.02%Best
Top 10 Weight51.6%Best57.0%
Fund FamilyNeuberger BermanCarillon Family of Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 10, 2026Mar 21, 2006

Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NQLT vs RJCA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare NQLT against instead:NQLT vs SPYNQLT vs QQQNQLT vs VOONQLT vs VTIRJCA against:RJCA vs VXUS

NQLT vs RJCA Performance

Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, NQLT is up 2.29% versus a gain of 4.02% for RJCA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NQLT charges 0.48% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $61 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NQLT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for RJCA.

Holdings Overlap

NQLT already in RJCA48.3%
RJCA already in NQLT49.1%

48.3% of NQLT's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 49.1% of RJCA's money is in holdings NQLT also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 63 and 72.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 58 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for NQLT (49.9% of the fund), and 47 for NQLT that do not appear in RJCA (45.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NQLTWeight in RJCADifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.09%15.22%9.13%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.64%7.85%0.21%
AAPLApple, Inc6.97%7.19%0.22%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc7.67%1.94%5.73%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C5.40%3.68%1.72%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.68%4.73%1.05%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.14%3.09%0.05%
MAMastercard Inc2.63%1.16%1.47%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock1.35%1.69%0.34%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.1.48%0.99%0.49%

49.1% of RJCA is already inside NQLT.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NQLTRJCA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NQLT or RJCA?

NQLT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while RJCA charges 0.61%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NQLT and RJCA?

49.1% of RJCA's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 49.1% of RJCA's is in holdings NQLT also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 71 in RJCA.

Which pays a higher dividend, NQLT or RJCA?

NQLT yields 0.00% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so RJCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RJCA better than NQLT?

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.