NQLT vs THRO

NQLT vs THRO

Which is better, NQLT or THRO?

NQLT costs less.

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. THRO is less concentrated, with 43.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.

Lower Fees: NQLTLess Concentrated: THRO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNQLTTHRO
Expense Ratio0.48%Best0.57%
AUM$50M$7.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.30%
Holdings63251
YTD Return+3.05%+14.53%Best
1Y Return-+17.92%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.68%
Top 10 Weight51.6%43.5%Best
Fund FamilyNeuberger BermanBlackRock, Inc. (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 10, 2026Dec 14, 2021

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NQLT vs THRO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare NQLT against instead:NQLT vs SPYNQLT vs QQQNQLT vs VOONQLT vs VTITHRO against:THRO vs VXUS

NQLT vs THRO Performance

Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Year to date, NQLT is up 3.05% versus a gain of 14.53% for THRO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NQLT charges 0.48% per year while THRO charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $57 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NQLT currently yields 0.00% against 0.30% for THRO.

Holdings Overlap

NQLT already in THRO68.0%
THRO already in NQLT46.2%

68.0% of NQLT's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 46.2% of THRO's money is in holdings NQLT also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

28 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 247 in THRO, against full books of 63 and 251.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 136 positions for THRO that do not appear in our book for NQLT (52.6% of the fund), and 31 for NQLT that do not appear in THRO (25.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NQLTWeight in THRODifference
AAPLApple, Inc6.97%8.21%1.24%
NVDANvidia Corp6.09%8.58%2.49%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.64%6.24%1.40%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc7.67%4.47%3.20%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.68%3.79%0.11%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C5.40%1.87%3.53%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.31%2.59%1.72%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity3.65%0.74%2.91%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.14%0.80%2.34%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common1.37%2.02%0.65%

68.0% of NQLT is already inside THRO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NQLTTHRO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NQLT or THRO?

NQLT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while THRO charges 0.57%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NQLT and THRO?

68.0% of NQLT's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 46.2% of THRO's is in holdings NQLT also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 247 in THRO.

Which pays a higher dividend, NQLT or THRO?

NQLT yields 0.00% while THRO yields 0.30%, so THRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is THRO better than NQLT?

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. THRO is less concentrated, with 43.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.