NTSX vs SCHX
WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund vs Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, NTSX or SCHX?
Nearly the same fund. SCHX costs less.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSX | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $75.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 506 | 752 |
| YTD Return | +8.74% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.97% | +16.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.03% | +22.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.36% | +12.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.3%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,940 | $18,068Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2018 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 2, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.2 years).
NTSX vs SCHX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.
NTSX vs SCHX Performance
WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NTSX returned +10.97% while SCHX returned +16.62%. Year to date, NTSX is up 8.74% versus a gain of 13.08% for SCHX.
Over three years, NTSX compounded at +20.03% per year against +22.27% for SCHX; over five years the annualized figures are +8.36% and +12.56% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHX has the edge at +13.86% annualized vs +11.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.2% for NTSX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.3% for NTSX and -34.3% for SCHX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSX charges 0.20% per year while SCHX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSX currently yields 1.08% against 1.04% for SCHX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 89.0% of SCHX's money is in holdings NTSX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NTSX, our book for it covers 90.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of SCHX is already inside NTSX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
473 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in NTSX and 752 in SCHX, against full books of 506 and 752.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NTSX | Weight in SCHX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.11% | 8.02% | 0.91% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.82% | 6.90% | 0.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.07% | 5.44% | 0.37% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc-cl A | 5.71% | 2.86% | 2.85% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.53% | 3.50% | 0.03% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.23% | 2.28% | 0.05% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.06% | 2.40% | 0.34% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.35% | 1.72% | 0.37% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.05% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.51% | 1.30% | 0.21% |
89.0% of SCHX is already inside NTSX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSX or SCHX?
NTSX has an expense ratio of 0.20% while SCHX charges 0.03%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NTSX or SCHX?
Over the past year NTSX returned +10.97% vs +16.62% for SCHX, so SCHX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), NTSX annualized +11.88% vs +13.86% for SCHX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NTSX or SCHX?
SCHX has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.2% for NTSX. Worst drawdown: NTSX -31.3% vs SCHX -34.3%.
Should I hold both NTSX and SCHX?
NTSX and SCHX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSX and SCHX?
At least 89.0% of SCHX's money is in holdings NTSX also owns. Our book for NTSX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 473 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in NTSX and 752 in SCHX.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSX or SCHX?
NTSX yields 1.08% while SCHX yields 1.04%, so NTSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHX better than NTSX?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.