NUDG vs VTI

NUDG vs VTI

Which is better, NUDG or VTI?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNUDGVTI
Expense Ratio0.61%0.03%Best
AUM$6.2B$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.50%1.06%
Holdings433,524
YTD Return+2.67%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight42.3%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyNuveenVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 2, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NUDG vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NUDG vs VTI Performance

Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NUDG is up 2.67% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NUDG charges 0.61% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDG currently yields 0.50% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

NUDG already in VTI94.5%
VTI already in NUDG26.3%

94.5% of NUDG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 26.3% of VTI's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.

Most of NUDG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

41 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 43 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,115 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for NUDG (71.3% of the fund), and 0 for NUDG that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NUDGWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.67%5.11%2.56%
AAPLApple, Inc6.37%6.30%0.07%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.11%2.38%2.73%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.68%2.12%1.56%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.72%1.29%2.43%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A3.83%0.26%3.57%
MAMastercard Inc2.54%0.63%1.91%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd2.01%0.90%1.11%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares2.45%0.31%2.14%
NEENextera Energy Inc2.43%0.23%2.20%

94.5% of NUDG is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NUDGVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NUDG or VTI?

NUDG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NUDG and VTI?

94.5% of NUDG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 26.3% of VTI's is in holdings NUDG also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in NUDG and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, NUDG or VTI?

NUDG yields 0.50% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than NUDG?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.