NUDV vs WTV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF vs WisdomTree US Value Fund
Which is better, NUDV or WTV?
WTV has been ahead.
WTV has a lower expense ratio. WTV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. WTV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUDV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $3.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.07% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 86 | 126 |
| YTD Return | +9.31% | +13.45%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.48% | +20.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.67% | +21.54%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.88% | +13.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8%Best | 17.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.1% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,302 | $18,985Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.5% | 20.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2021 | Feb 23, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026 (5 years).
NUDV vs WTV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
NUDV vs WTV Performance
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) is an ETF from Nuveen and WisdomTree US Value Fund (WTV) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year NUDV returned +15.48% while WTV returned +20.22%. Year to date, NUDV is up 9.31% versus a gain of 13.45% for WTV.
Over three years, NUDV compounded at +15.67% per year against +21.54% for WTV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.88% and +13.68% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WTV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.8% for NUDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.1% for NUDV and -19.3% for WTV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUDV charges 0.26% per year while WTV charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $12 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDV currently yields 2.07% against 1.82% for WTV.
Holdings Overlap
28.5% of NUDV's money is in holdings WTV also owns. 14.7% of WTV's money is in holdings NUDV also owns.
NUDV and WTV share little of their money.
18 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in NUDV and 123 in WTV, against full books of 86 and 126.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for WTV that do not appear in our book for NUDV (79.6% of the fund), and 62 for NUDV that do not appear in WTV (67.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUDV | Weight in WTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.60% | 1.70% | 0.90% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.34% | 1.82% | 0.52% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 2.32% | 1.26% | 1.06% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Vz | 2.14% | 1.27% | 0.87% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 2.54% | 0.61% | 1.93% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 1.90% | 0.79% | 1.11% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp | 1.75% | 0.83% | 0.92% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 2.25% | 0.28% | 1.97% |
| TRVThe Travelers Cos, Inc. | 1.64% | 0.76% | 0.88% |
| CICigna Corp. | 1.45% | 0.93% | 0.52% |
28.5% of NUDV is already inside WTV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUDV or WTV?
NUDV has an expense ratio of 0.26% while WTV charges 0.12%. WTV is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NUDV or WTV?
Over the past year NUDV returned +15.48% vs +20.22% for WTV, so WTV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NUDV or WTV?
WTV has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.8% for NUDV. Worst drawdown: NUDV -20.1% vs WTV -19.3%.
Should I hold both NUDV and WTV?
NUDV and WTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NUDV and WTV?
28.5% of NUDV's money is in holdings WTV also owns. 14.7% of WTV's is in holdings NUDV also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in NUDV and 123 in WTV.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUDV or WTV?
NUDV yields 2.07% while WTV yields 1.82%, so NUDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WTV better than NUDV?
WTV has a lower expense ratio. WTV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. WTV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.