NUGT vs PSCJ

NUGT vs PSCJ

Which is better, NUGT or PSCJ?

Each has led over a different period.

PSCJ has a lower expense ratio. NUGT led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, PSCJ over 1Y.

Lower Fees: PSCJHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNUGTPSCJ
Expense Ratio1.13%0.49%Best
AUM$993M$42M
Dividend Yield0.75%0.00%
Holdings2012
YTD Return-27.70%+7.57%Best
1Y Return-17.67%+10.05%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+64.31%Best+13.98%
5Y Return (annualized)+21.20%Best+9.29%
Volatility (annualized)77.5%8.1%Best
Max Drawdown-73.7%-11.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$26,152Best$15,592
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustPacer ETFs
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionDec 8, 2010Jun 30, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).

NUGT vs PSCJ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.

Compare NUGT against instead:NUGT vs SPYNUGT vs QQQNUGT vs VOONUGT vs VTIPSCJ against:PSCJ vs VXUS

NUGT vs PSCJ Performance

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative July ETF (PSCJ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year NUGT returned -17.67% while PSCJ returned +10.05%. Year to date, NUGT is down 27.70% versus a gain of 7.57% for PSCJ.

Over three years, NUGT compounded at +64.31% per year against +13.98% for PSCJ; over five years the annualized figures are +21.20% and +9.29% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NUGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 77.5% compared with 8.1% for PSCJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.7% for NUGT and -11.9% for PSCJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NUGT charges 1.13% per year while PSCJ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $49 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUGT currently yields 0.75% against 0.00% for PSCJ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NUGT and PSCJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NUGTPSCJ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NUGT or PSCJ?

NUGT has an expense ratio of 1.13% while PSCJ charges 0.49%. PSCJ is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NUGT or PSCJ?

Over the past year NUGT returned -17.67% vs +10.05% for PSCJ, so PSCJ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NUGT or PSCJ?

NUGT has been the more volatile fund at 77.5% annualized versus 8.1% for PSCJ. Worst drawdown: NUGT -73.7% vs PSCJ -11.9%.

Should I hold both NUGT and PSCJ?

NUGT and PSCJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NUGT or PSCJ?

NUGT yields 0.75% while PSCJ yields 0.00%, so NUGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PSCJ better than NUGT?

PSCJ has a lower expense ratio. NUGT led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, PSCJ over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.