NVDQ vs VTI
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NVDQ or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.59, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVDQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -47.59% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -55.89% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -82.43% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.1% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $54 | $18,600Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 19, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
NVDQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
NVDQ vs VTI Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVDQ returned -55.89% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, NVDQ is down 47.59% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, NVDQ compounded at -82.43% per year against +21.97% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.1% compared with 12.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.59. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVDQ charges 1.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDQ currently yields 0.53% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVDQ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVDQ or VTI?
NVDQ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVDQ or VTI?
Over the past year NVDQ returned -55.89% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVDQ or VTI?
NVDQ has been the more volatile fund at 58.1% annualized versus 12.6% for VTI.
Should I hold both NVDQ and VTI?
NVDQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.59, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVDQ or VTI?
NVDQ yields 0.53% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NVDQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.59, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.