OAKM vs VTI
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, OAKM or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 41 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +6.05% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.80% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2%Best | 12.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,344 | $12,915Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
OAKM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
OAKM vs VTI Performance
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OAKM returned +14.80% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, OAKM is up 6.05% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 12.2% for OAKM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for OAKM and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKM charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKM currently yields 0.65% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
93.7% of OAKM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 14.7% of VTI's money is in holdings OAKM also owns.
Most of OAKM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
36 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in OAKM and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 41 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,121 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for OAKM (83.0% of the fund), and 1 for OAKM that do not appear in VTI (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OAKM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.61% | 3.41% | 1.80% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 4.23% | 0.27% | 3.96% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.21% | 2.12% | 0.09% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.43% | 1.70% | 0.73% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 3.49% | 0.49% | 3.00% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 3.67% | 0.30% | 3.37% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 3.65% | 0.10% | 3.55% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 3.07% | 0.54% | 2.53% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 3.53% | 0.06% | 3.47% |
| ICEIntercontinental Exchange Grp Usd0.01 | 3.32% | 0.12% | 3.20% |
93.7% of OAKM is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKM or VTI?
OAKM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OAKM or VTI?
Over the past year OAKM returned +14.80% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OAKM annualized +11.72% vs +14.41% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OAKM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 12.2% for OAKM. Worst drawdown: OAKM -15.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both OAKM and VTI?
OAKM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OAKM and VTI?
93.7% of OAKM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 14.7% of VTI's is in holdings OAKM also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in OAKM and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKM or VTI?
OAKM yields 0.65% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than OAKM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.