OCTJ vs VYM
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, OCTJ or VYM?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OCTJ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.32% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 18 | 608 |
| YTD Return | -0.13% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.46% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.98% | +18.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.2%Best | 10.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.3%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $11,284 | $16,809Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
OCTJ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
OCTJ vs VYM Performance
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October (OCTJ) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OCTJ returned +0.46% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, OCTJ is down 0.13% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, OCTJ compounded at +3.98% per year against +18.60% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.9% compared with 2.2% for OCTJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.3% for OCTJ and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OCTJ charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OCTJ currently yields 5.32% against 2.37% for VYM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OCTJ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OCTJ or VYM?
OCTJ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OCTJ or VYM?
Over the past year OCTJ returned +0.46% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OCTJ or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.9% annualized versus 2.2% for OCTJ. Worst drawdown: OCTJ -5.3% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both OCTJ and VYM?
OCTJ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OCTJ or VYM?
OCTJ yields 5.32% while VYM yields 2.37%, so OCTJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than OCTJ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.