ODTE vs UWM
VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF vs ProShares Ultra Russell2000
Which is better, ODTE or UWM?
ODTE costs less.
ODTE has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ODTE | UWM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $3M | $219M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.99% | 0.87% |
| Holdings | 9 | 1,994 |
| YTD Return | +4.63% | +12.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.67% |
| Fund Family | VegaShares ETFs | ProShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Apr 2, 2026 | Jan 23, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ODTE vs UWM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ODTE vs UWM Performance
VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF (ODTE) is an ETF from VegaShares ETFs and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is an ETF from ProShares. Year to date, ODTE is up 4.63% versus a gain of 12.94% for UWM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ODTE charges 0.76% per year while UWM charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $95 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ODTE currently yields 6.99% against 0.87% for UWM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in ODTE and 2 in UWM, totalling 100.3% and 0.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in ODTE and 2 in UWM, against full books of 9 and 1,994.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ODTE and UWM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ODTE or UWM?
ODTE has an expense ratio of 0.76% while UWM charges 0.95%. ODTE is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ODTE or UWM?
ODTE yields 6.99% while UWM yields 0.87%, so ODTE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UWM better than ODTE?
ODTE has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.