OMFL vs SDVD
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Which is better, OMFL or SDVD?
OMFL has been ahead.
OMFL has a lower expense ratio. OMFL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMFL | SDVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $4.8B | $872M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 8.68% |
| Holdings | 1,272 | 348 |
| YTD Return | +15.31%Best | +3.20% |
| 1Y Return | +18.97%Best | +6.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.52%Best | +13.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.22% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7%Best | 22.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5%Best | -29.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $14,682Best | $11,057 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.0% | 10.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 10, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).
OMFL vs SDVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
OMFL vs SDVD Performance
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year OMFL returned +18.97% while SDVD returned +6.25%. Year to date, OMFL is up 15.31% versus a gain of 3.20% for SDVD.
Over three years, OMFL compounded at +16.52% per year against +13.58% for SDVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 13.7% for OMFL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for OMFL and -29.1% for SDVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMFL charges 0.29% per year while SDVD charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $85 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFL currently yields 0.84% against 8.68% for SDVD.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of OMFL's money is in holdings SDVD also owns. 39.8% of SDVD's money is in holdings OMFL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
66 positions in common, counted across the 577 positions we hold weights for in OMFL and 172 in SDVD, against full books of 1,272 and 348.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 103 positions for SDVD that do not appear in our book for OMFL (58.2% of the fund), and 486 for OMFL that do not appear in SDVD (95.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OMFL | Weight in SDVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 0.15% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.10% | 1.00% | 0.90% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 0.15% | 0.95% | 0.80% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.12% | 0.97% | 0.85% |
| AITApplied Industrial Technologies Inc | 0.04% | 1.03% | 0.99% |
| WTSWatts Water Technologies Inc | 0.04% | 1.00% | 0.96% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.13% | 0.89% | 0.76% |
| MLIMueller Industries Inc | 0.08% | 0.91% | 0.83% |
| EXPEExpedia Inc | 0.05% | 0.93% | 0.88% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 0.09% | 0.87% | 0.78% |
39.8% of SDVD is already inside OMFL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMFL or SDVD?
OMFL has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SDVD charges 0.85%. OMFL is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OMFL or SDVD?
Over the past year OMFL returned +18.97% vs +6.25% for SDVD, so OMFL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OMFL or SDVD?
SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 13.7% for OMFL. Worst drawdown: OMFL -15.5% vs SDVD -29.1%.
Should I hold both OMFL and SDVD?
OMFL and SDVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OMFL and SDVD?
39.8% of SDVD's money is in holdings OMFL also owns. 39.8% of SDVD's is in holdings OMFL also owns. They hold 66 positions in common, counted across the 577 positions we hold weights for in OMFL and 172 in SDVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMFL or SDVD?
OMFL yields 0.84% while SDVD yields 8.68%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SDVD better than OMFL?
OMFL has a lower expense ratio. OMFL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.