OMFS vs RUSC
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Russell Investments US Small Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, OMFS or RUSC?
Nearly the same fund. OMFS costs less.
OMFS has a lower expense ratio. RUSC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RUSC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMFS | RUSC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.64% |
| AUM | $264M | $81M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 2,228 | 491 |
| YTD Return | +8.89% | +13.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.32% | +17.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.55% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.67% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7%Best | -9.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $12,327 | $13,328Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.0% | 5.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | May 13, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
OMFS vs RUSC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
OMFS vs RUSC Performance
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Russell Investments US Small Cap Equity ETF (RUSC) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year OMFS returned +10.32% while RUSC returned +17.59%. Year to date, OMFS is up 8.89% versus a gain of 13.09% for RUSC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RUSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.6% for OMFS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for OMFS and -9.8% for RUSC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMFS charges 0.39% per year while RUSC charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $64 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFS currently yields 1.30% against 0.33% for RUSC.
Holdings Overlap
27.5% of OMFS's money is in holdings RUSC also owns. 42.9% of RUSC's money is in holdings OMFS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
195 positions in common, counted across the 933 positions we hold weights for in OMFS and 489 in RUSC, against full books of 2,228 and 491.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 189 positions for RUSC that do not appear in our book for OMFS (36.2% of the fund), and 697 for OMFS that do not appear in RUSC (67.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OMFS | Weight in RUSC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTRECaretrust Reit Inc Reit Usd.01 | 1.64% | 0.23% | 1.41% |
| FCFSFirstcash Inc | 1.53% | 0.21% | 1.32% |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corp | 1.17% | 0.16% | 1.01% |
| TVTXTravere Therapeutics Inc | 0.81% | 0.42% | 0.39% |
| KRYSKrystal Biotech Inc | 0.98% | 0.25% | 0.73% |
| KLICKulicke & Soffa Industries | 0.84% | 0.23% | 0.61% |
| WTWisdomtree Investments Inc | 0.78% | 0.22% | 0.56% |
| CDNACaredx Inc | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.04% |
| YOUClear Secure Inc -Class A | 0.78% | 0.20% | 0.58% |
| IDCCInterdigital Inc | 0.64% | 0.24% | 0.40% |
42.9% of RUSC is already inside OMFS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMFS or RUSC?
OMFS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while RUSC charges 0.64%. OMFS is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OMFS or RUSC?
Over the past year OMFS returned +10.32% vs +17.59% for RUSC, so RUSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), OMFS annualized +16.12% vs +22.78% for RUSC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OMFS or RUSC?
RUSC has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.6% for OMFS. Worst drawdown: OMFS -9.7% vs RUSC -9.8%.
Should I hold both OMFS and RUSC?
OMFS and RUSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OMFS and RUSC?
42.9% of RUSC's money is in holdings OMFS also owns. 42.9% of RUSC's is in holdings OMFS also owns. They hold 195 positions in common, counted across the 933 positions we hold weights for in OMFS and 489 in RUSC.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMFS or RUSC?
OMFS yields 1.30% while RUSC yields 0.33%, so OMFS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RUSC better than OMFS?
OMFS has a lower expense ratio. RUSC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RUSC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.