ONEV vs VTI
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ONEV or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ONEV is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONEV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $274M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.01% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 450 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.83% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.72% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.00% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5%Tie | 15.5%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -40.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,693 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.6%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.9 years).
ONEV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.9 years both funds cover.
ONEV vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ONEV returned +10.72% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, ONEV is up 8.83% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, ONEV compounded at +12.80% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.00% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.26% annualized vs +9.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ONEV and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.5% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.2% for ONEV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONEV charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEV currently yields 2.01% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.6% of ONEV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.7% of VTI's money is in holdings ONEV also owns.
Most of ONEV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
424 positions in common, counted across the 448 positions we hold weights for in ONEV and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 450 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 753 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ONEV (86.9% of the fund), and 12 for ONEV that do not appear in VTI (1.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ONEV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLAllstate Corp. | 1.53% | 0.09% | 1.44% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 1.21% | 0.17% | 1.04% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 1.09% | 0.14% | 0.95% |
| TRVThe Travelers Cos, Inc. | 0.89% | 0.11% | 0.78% |
| CICigna Corp. | 0.88% | 0.10% | 0.78% |
| ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd 5.450% | 0.90% | 0.04% | 0.86% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 0.75% | 0.13% | 0.62% |
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 0.83% | 0.04% | 0.79% |
| HIGHartford Financial Services Group Inc. | 0.76% | 0.05% | 0.71% |
| KRKroger Co. | 0.76% | 0.04% | 0.72% |
96.6% of ONEV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONEV or VTI?
ONEV has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ONEV or VTI?
Over the past year ONEV returned +10.72% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ONEV annualized +9.36% vs +13.26% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ONEV or VTI?
ONEV and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.5% annualized. Worst drawdown: ONEV -40.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ONEV and VTI?
ONEV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ONEV and VTI?
96.6% of ONEV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.7% of VTI's is in holdings ONEV also owns. They hold 424 positions in common, counted across the 448 positions we hold weights for in ONEV and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONEV or VTI?
ONEV yields 2.01% while VTI yields 1.06%, so ONEV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ONEV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ONEV is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.