OVB vs RSBT
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF vs Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, OVB or RSBT?
Each has led over a different period.
OVB has a lower expense ratio. OVB led over the full window, RSBT over 1Y and 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OVB | RSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $47M | $165M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.91% | 2.95% |
| Holdings | 16 | 34 |
| YTD Return | -4.97% | +8.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | -5.85% | +8.40%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.18% | +4.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.34% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2%Best | 11.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4%Best | -23.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $10,874Best | $10,019 |
| Fund Family | Overlay Shares | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2019 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).
OVB vs RSBT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
OVB vs RSBT Performance
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) is an ETF from Overlay Shares and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year OVB returned -5.85% while RSBT returned +8.40%. Year to date, OVB is down 4.97% versus a gain of 8.40% for RSBT.
Over three years, OVB compounded at +4.18% per year against +4.37% for RSBT. Across the full 4-year window we track, OVB has the edge at +2.29% annualized vs +0.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSBT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.2% compared with 7.2% for OVB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for OVB and -23.6% for RSBT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OVB charges 0.79% per year while RSBT charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $101 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OVB currently yields 7.91% against 2.95% for RSBT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in OVB and 2 in RSBT, totalling 100.2% and 90.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in OVB and 2 in RSBT, against full books of 16 and 34.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OVB | Weight in RSBT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 0.45% | 16.10% | 15.65% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OVB and RSBT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OVB or RSBT?
OVB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while RSBT charges 1.01%. OVB is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OVB or RSBT?
Over the past year OVB returned -5.85% vs +8.40% for RSBT, so RSBT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OVB annualized +2.29% vs +0.05% for RSBT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OVB or RSBT?
RSBT has been the more volatile fund at 11.2% annualized versus 7.2% for OVB. Worst drawdown: OVB -8.4% vs RSBT -23.6%.
Should I hold both OVB and RSBT?
OVB and RSBT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OVB or RSBT?
OVB yields 7.91% while RSBT yields 2.95%, so OVB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSBT better than OVB?
OVB has a lower expense ratio. OVB led over the full window, RSBT over 1Y and 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.