PANG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PANG or VTI?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PANG led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PANG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +213.61%Best | +13.48% |
| 1Y Return | +125.89%Best | +16.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.11% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 127.8% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.4% | -14.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $25,275Best | $13,945 |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026 (1.6 years).
PANG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
PANG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF (PANG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PANG returned +125.89% while VTI returned +16.55%. Year to date, PANG is up 213.61% versus a gain of 13.48% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PANG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 127.8% compared with 11.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.4% for PANG and -14.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PANG charges 0.76% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PANG currently yields 3.37% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PANG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PANG or VTI?
PANG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PANG or VTI?
Over the past year PANG returned +125.89% vs +16.55% for VTI, so PANG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PANG annualized +78.52% vs +23.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PANG or VTI?
PANG has been the more volatile fund at 127.8% annualized versus 11.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PANG -62.4% vs VTI -14.0%.
Should I hold both PANG and VTI?
PANG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PANG or VTI?
PANG yields 3.37% while VTI yields 1.06%, so PANG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PANG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PANG led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.