PAUG vs TSMY
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - August vs YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, PAUG or TSMY?
TSMY has been ahead.
PAUG has a lower expense ratio. TSMY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAUG | TSMY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $1.1B | $103M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 53.18% |
| Holdings | 18 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +8.30% | +30.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.79% | +38.76%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.33% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7%Best | 27.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4%Best | -31.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $12,521 | $20,207Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2019 | Aug 20, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 21, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
PAUG vs TSMY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
PAUG vs TSMY Performance
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year PAUG returned +10.79% while TSMY returned +38.76%. Year to date, PAUG is up 8.30% versus a gain of 30.11% for TSMY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSMY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 5.7% for PAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for PAUG and -31.1% for TSMY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAUG charges 0.79% per year while TSMY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $101 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAUG currently yields 0.00% against 53.18% for TSMY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PAUG and TSMY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAUG or TSMY?
PAUG has an expense ratio of 0.79% while TSMY charges 1.01%. PAUG is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PAUG or TSMY?
Over the past year PAUG returned +10.79% vs +38.76% for TSMY, so TSMY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PAUG annualized +11.30% vs +39.79% for TSMY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PAUG or TSMY?
TSMY has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 5.7% for PAUG. Worst drawdown: PAUG -10.4% vs TSMY -31.1%.
Should I hold both PAUG and TSMY?
PAUG and TSMY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAUG or TSMY?
PAUG yields 0.00% while TSMY yields 53.18%, so TSMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSMY better than PAUG?
PAUG has a lower expense ratio. TSMY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.