PAUG vs UMAR

PAUG vs UMAR

Which is better, PAUG or UMAR?

Each has led over a different period.

PAUG led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, UMAR over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPAUGUMAR
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$1.1B$143M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1824
YTD Return+8.30%+8.65%Best
1Y Return+10.79%+11.58%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+14.33%Best+12.86%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.63%Best+8.09%
Volatility (annualized)8.0%5.9%Best
Max Drawdown-15.8%-11.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,836Best$14,755
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionAug 1, 2019Feb 28, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 2, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.6 years).

PAUG vs UMAR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.6 years both funds cover.

Compare PAUG against instead:PAUG vs SPYPAUG vs QQQPAUG vs VOOPAUG vs VTIUMAR against:UMAR vs VXUS

PAUG vs UMAR Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year PAUG returned +10.79% while UMAR returned +11.58%. Year to date, PAUG is up 8.30% versus a gain of 8.65% for UMAR.

Over three years, PAUG compounded at +14.33% per year against +12.86% for UMAR; over five years the annualized figures are +9.63% and +8.09% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, PAUG has the edge at +9.66% annualized vs +7.80%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PAUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.0% compared with 5.9% for UMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for PAUG and -11.1% for UMAR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PAUG charges 0.79% per year while UMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, PAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for UMAR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PAUG and UMAR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PAUGUMAR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PAUG or UMAR?

PAUG has an expense ratio of 0.79% while UMAR charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, PAUG or UMAR?

Over the past year PAUG returned +10.79% vs +11.58% for UMAR, so UMAR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), PAUG annualized +9.66% vs +7.80% for UMAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PAUG or UMAR?

PAUG has been the more volatile fund at 8.0% annualized versus 5.9% for UMAR. Worst drawdown: PAUG -15.8% vs UMAR -11.1%.

Should I hold both PAUG and UMAR?

PAUG and UMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PAUG or UMAR?

PAUG yields 0.00% while UMAR yields 0.00%, so UMAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is UMAR better than PAUG?

PAUG led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, UMAR over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.