PAUG vs ZAUG

PAUG vs ZAUG

Which is better, PAUG or ZAUG?

PAUG has been ahead.

PAUG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: PAUG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPAUGZAUG
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$1.1B$165M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1821
YTD Return+8.30%Best+4.59%
1Y Return+10.79%Best+5.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.33%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.63%-
Volatility (annualized)5.7%3.0%Best
Max Drawdown-10.4%-4.8%Best
$10,000 over 2.2 years$12,829Best$11,631
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionAug 1, 2019Jul 31, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).

PAUG vs ZAUG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.

Compare PAUG against instead:PAUG vs SPYPAUG vs QQQPAUG vs VOOPAUG vs VTIZAUG against:ZAUG vs VXUS

PAUG vs ZAUG Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year PAUG returned +10.79% while ZAUG returned +5.65%. Year to date, PAUG is up 8.30% versus a gain of 4.59% for ZAUG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PAUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.7% compared with 3.0% for ZAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for PAUG and -4.8% for ZAUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PAUG charges 0.79% per year while ZAUG charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, PAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZAUG.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PAUG and ZAUG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PAUGZAUG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PAUG or ZAUG?

PAUG has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZAUG charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, PAUG or ZAUG?

Over the past year PAUG returned +10.79% vs +5.65% for ZAUG, so PAUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PAUG annualized +11.99% vs +7.11% for ZAUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PAUG or ZAUG?

PAUG has been the more volatile fund at 5.7% annualized versus 3.0% for ZAUG. Worst drawdown: PAUG -10.4% vs ZAUG -4.8%.

Should I hold both PAUG and ZAUG?

PAUG and ZAUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PAUG or ZAUG?

PAUG yields 0.00% while ZAUG yields 0.00%, so ZAUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZAUG better than PAUG?

PAUG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.