PBFB vs PBJL
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July
Which is better, PBFB or PBJL?
Each has led over a different period.
PBFB led over 1Y, PBJL over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBFB | PBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $42M | $75M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +7.64%Best | +6.85% |
| 1Y Return | +10.57%Best | +9.12% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.4%Best | 4.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.7%Best | -9.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $12,644 | $12,758Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2024 | May 8, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 8, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
PBFB vs PBJL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
PBFB vs PBJL Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July (PBJL) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year PBFB returned +10.57% while PBJL returned +9.12%. Year to date, PBFB is up 7.64% versus a gain of 6.85% for PBJL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.9% compared with 4.4% for PBFB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.7% for PBFB and -9.0% for PBJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBFB charges 0.50% per year while PBJL charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, PBFB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PBJL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBFB and PBJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBFB or PBJL?
PBFB has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PBJL charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PBFB or PBJL?
Over the past year PBFB returned +10.57% vs +9.12% for PBJL, so PBFB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PBFB annualized +10.27% vs +10.68% for PBJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBFB or PBJL?
PBJL has been the more volatile fund at 4.9% annualized versus 4.4% for PBFB. Worst drawdown: PBFB -8.7% vs PBJL -9.0%.
Should I hold both PBFB and PBJL?
PBFB and PBJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBFB or PBJL?
PBFB yields 0.00% while PBJL yields 0.00%, so PBJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBJL better than PBFB?
PBFB led over 1Y, PBJL over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.